The Comparability Effects of Principles Based Standards
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-1-2025
Abstract
This paper delves into the impact of transitioning from rules-based to principles-based accounting standards and its effect on financial statement comparability. The study leverages the ASC 606 adoption as a unique event to assess how this shift influenced the comparability of financial statements across industries and its effect on analyst coverage. Drawing upon the foundational work of De Franco et al. (2011) to develop a financial comparability measure, the paper evaluates the research question employing multi-variate regression models to explore potential changes in comparability across firms between the Pre-ASC 606 and the ASC 606 period. The findings indicate an improvement in financial statement comparability at the market level, with a more pronounced effect within industries characterised by high recurring revenues. Furthermore, the study reveals a positive correlation between improved financial statement comparability and increased analyst coverage, implying that enhanced transparency under principles-based accounting standards makes firms more attractive to analysts.
Published In
Cabán, David. “The Comparability Effects of Principles-Based Standards.” American Journal of Finance and Accounting 8, no. 3 (2025):195-216. https://dx.doi.org/10.1504/AJFA.2025.146006.
Publication Title
American Journal of Finance and Accounting
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1504/AJFA.2025.146006
Comments
Originally published in the American Journal of Finance and Accounting